Patrocinado por PHPDocX

Síguenos en Twitter

Buscar en WikilleratO
   

Assessing The Safety Of Magnetic Workholding

De Wikillerato

Resistance to the implementation of magnetic operate holding generally begins with a concern for security. These issues can be allayed by assessing the technologies, holding power and optimal operating conditions of magnetic work holding with regards to operational security.

In spite of the competitive magnetic workholding added benefits of magnetic workholding in lowering charges and improving productivity, there still exists a resistance for the implementation of magnetic technology because the key operate holder in machining operations. This resistance ordinarily begins having a concern for security. By assessing the technology, holding energy and optimal operating situations of magnetic operate holding relative to operational security, these concerns can be allayed.

Magnetic Operate Holding as a Secure Technologies

If a machine operator has held workpieces with mechanical clamps for decades, the idea of relying on magnetism to hold workpieces, in particular in heavy milling operations, boils down to a problem of trust: Is this truly secure? Even though understandable this opinion is rooted in subjectivity not objective fact. More than probably, those that hold this point of view might not completely have an understanding of the facts of how secure magnetic function holding is.

So, how can magnetic operate holding be viewed as as a protected technologies? By definition, it produces a uniform, consistent, and infinite holding energy that will not unwind, give, or reduce until an operator de-energizes it.

In general, magnetic work holders are constructed with an array of individual magnets embedded into a magnetic chuck or plate. Each magnet features a north and south pole across which flows magnetic power known as flux. When a workpiece is placed across the poles of those magnets, flux flows into it. When placed within this flux field, a magnetic field of opposite polarity is induced into the workpiece thereby producing a magnetic attraction involving the chuck plus the workpiece. This attraction will remain constant, uniform, infinite, and reputable so long as the magnetic field is energized. This reliability tends to make magnetic workholding a definitely secure technology.

Magnetic Perform Holding as a Secure Holding Force

Holding power or strength is yet another aspect regarded when forming an opinion in regards to the security of magnetic workholding. If an operator does not understand how robust magnetic workholding is, he could mistakenly believe magnetic technology will not be robust adequate to perform the job safely. This opinion might be allayed by two facts:

(1) magnetic workholding can have a clamping energy up to 1000 daN and

(two) based upon the application, an instantaneous clamping force of 12 tons per square foot may be generated by magnetic workholders. This degree of holding force is more than comparable to mechanical clamps with a single added advantage: magnetic holding force is uniform, constant and infinite till the operator de-energizes it.

Optimal Operating Circumstances

To implement magnetic operate holding options might call for some education to know the technology's optimal operating conditions. For example, magnetic perform holding is best utilised with smooth-surfaced workpieces in lieu of rough ones due to the fact the smoothness decreases the air gap amongst the workpiece plus the magnet; small air gaps increase magnetic attraction plus the holding bond. Some components are far better conductors of magnetism than other people. By way of example, annealed supplies are perfect even though hardened supplies do not absorb flux as very easily and will retain some magnetism. This situation may be corrected inside seconds with demagnetization. Lastly, the direction of your holding force is however a further adjustment an operator might have to make to safely implement magnetic function holding. All magnets have 100 percent clamping force straight away from the face on the magnet, but only about 20 % clamping force against side forces. So, the geometry of a reduce should be regarded within the machining process to reap the advantages of this type of workholding.

   
 
ASIGNATURAS
MatemáticasFísicaQuímicaBiologíaDibujoHistoriaLengua y LiteraturaHistoria del ArteFilosofía
Creative Commons License
Los contenidos de Wikillerato están disponibles bajo una licencia de Creative Commons.
Pueden utilizarse y redistribuirse libremente siempre que se reconozca su procedencia.